Ralph H. Seipel, D/B/A Investors Surety Company v. Securities and Exchange Commission
This text of 229 F.2d 758 (Ralph H. Seipel, D/B/A Investors Surety Company v. Securities and Exchange Commission) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Alleging that Ralph H. Seipel, a registered investment adviser, had violated § 206(1, 2) of the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, 15 U.S.C.A. § 80b-6(l) and (2), and was about to continue to do so, the Securities and Exchange Commission sued in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia to enjoin the continuance of the acts and practices said to constitute such violations. The District Court entered a permanent injunction from which Seipel appeals.
The record fully justified the action of the District Court.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
229 F.2d 758, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ralph-h-seipel-dba-investors-surety-company-v-securities-and-exchange-cadc-1956.