Ralph H. Seipel, D/B/A Investors Surety Company v. Securities and Exchange Commission

229 F.2d 758
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit·Decided February 29, 1956·No. 12557·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Alleging that Ralph H. Seipel, a registered investment adviser, had violated § 206(1, 2) of the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, 15 U.S.C.A. § 80b-6(l) and (2), and was about to continue to do so, the Securities and Exchange Commission sued in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia to enjoin the continuance of the acts and practices said to constitute such violations. The District Court entered a permanent injunction from which Seipel appeals.

The record fully justified the action of the District Court.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ralph H. Seipel, D/B/A Investors Surety Company v. Securities and Exchange Commission, 229 F.2d 758 (D.C. Cir. 1956).

229 F.2d 758 (Ralph H. Seipel, D/B/A Investors Surety Company v. Securities and Exchange Commission) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related