Ralph Ferrara, Inc. v. Bermuda Limousine Co.

184 A.D.2d 301, 584 N.Y.S.2d 313, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7875
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJune 11, 1992
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 184 A.D.2d 301 (Ralph Ferrara, Inc. v. Bermuda Limousine Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ralph Ferrara, Inc. v. Bermuda Limousine Co., 184 A.D.2d 301, 584 N.Y.S.2d 313, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7875 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1992).

Opinions

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Carmen Beauchamp Ciparick, J.), entered February 1, 1991, which denied defendant’s motion to dismiss the complaint and granted plaintiff’s cross-motion to amend the caption of the action, affirmed, with costs.

The court did not abuse its discretion in granting plaintiff leave to amend the caption nunc pro tunc by substituting the real parties in interest, who were actually served with the summons and complaint, for a party which existed only as a trade name (CPLR 305 [c]; Ober v Rye Town Hilton, 159 AD2d 16, 20). Concur — Carro, J. P., Milonas, Kupferman and Asch, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United Community Insurance v. Ciraco
195 A.D.2d 333 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1993)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
184 A.D.2d 301, 584 N.Y.S.2d 313, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7875, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ralph-ferrara-inc-v-bermuda-limousine-co-nyappdiv-1992.