Ralph E. Rose v. William H. Bannan

234 F.2d 657, 1956 U.S. App. LEXIS 3741
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit·Decided June 6, 1956·No. 12603_1·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This appeal, wherein appellant filed briefs and appellees appeared by an Assistant Attorney General of the State of Michigan both in oral argument and by printed brief, was brought by Ralph Rose, who was committed to the custody of the Michigan State Hospital Commission as a criminal sexual psychopathic person pursuant to the laws of Michigan;

And it appearing from the opinion-order of United States District Judge Levin that similar allegations were made under the procedural device of habeas corpus in Rowan v. People, 6 Cir., 147 F.2d 138, and in Kemmerer v. Benson, 6 Cir., 165 F.2d 702, wherein the Michigan Act in question was held to be not subject to the constitutional questions reasserted by appellant in this case;

And the judgment entered by the district judge being in our opinion correct for the reasons stated by him, the judgment of dismissal is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ralph E. Rose v. William H. Bannan, 234 F.2d 657, 1956 U.S. App. LEXIS 3741 (6th Cir. 1956).

234 F.2d 657 (Ralph E. Rose v. William H. Bannan) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Lepoleon J. Griffith v. United States
234 F.2d 657 (Sixth Circuit, 1956)