Ralph E. Rose v. William H. Bannan
This text of 234 F.2d 657 (Ralph E. Rose v. William H. Bannan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This appeal, wherein appellant filed briefs and appellees appeared by an Assistant Attorney General of the State of Michigan both in oral argument and by printed brief, was brought by Ralph Rose, who was committed to the custody of the Michigan State Hospital Commission as a criminal sexual psychopathic person pursuant to the laws of Michigan;
And it appearing from the opinion-order of United States District Judge Levin that similar allegations were made under the procedural device of habeas corpus in Rowan v. People, 6 Cir., 147 F.2d 138, and in Kemmerer v. Benson, 6 Cir., 165 F.2d 702, wherein the Michigan Act in question was held to be not subject to the constitutional questions reasserted by appellant in this case;
And the judgment entered by the district judge being in our opinion correct for the reasons stated by him, the judgment of dismissal is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
234 F.2d 657, 1956 U.S. App. LEXIS 3741, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ralph-e-rose-v-william-h-bannan-ca6-1956.