Ralph E. Facemire v. Resolution Trust Corporation

8 F.3d 817, 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 34728, 1993 WL 455322
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedNovember 4, 1993
Docket92-1396
StatusUnpublished

This text of 8 F.3d 817 (Ralph E. Facemire v. Resolution Trust Corporation) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ralph E. Facemire v. Resolution Trust Corporation, 8 F.3d 817, 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 34728, 1993 WL 455322 (4th Cir. 1993).

Opinion

8 F.3d 817

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Ralph E. FACEMIRE, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
RESOLUTION TRUST CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 92-1396.

United States Court of Appeals,
Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: January 20, 1993.
Decided: November 4, 1993.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria.

Ralph E. Facemire, Appellant Pro Se.

Laura Marie D'Orsi, Reid & Priest, for Appellee.

E.D.Va.

AFFIRMED

Before WIDENER, WILKINS, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

OPINION

Ralph E. Facemire appeals from the district court's order granting summary judgment to Liberty Savings Bank* in this diversity action. Facemire claims that Liberty committed several intentional torts in connection with the sale of certain heavy construction equipment which he sold to Ben J. Powers Construction, Inc., which sale was financed by Liberty. We find that the same basic issue was decided by the Circuit Court of Fauquier County, Virginia, in Liberty Savings Bank v. Ben J. Powers Construction, Inc., No. CH-90-33, a case involving the same parties. Therefore, the district court was correct in holding that this case was barred by res judicata. Flora, Flora & Montague, Inc. v. Saunders, 367 S.E.2d 493 (Va. 1988). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*

Resolution Trust Corp. was substituted for Liberty Savings Bank on appeal pursuant to 12 U.S.C.A. § 1441a(l ) (West Supp. 1992)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Flora, Flora & Montague, Inc. v. Saunders
367 S.E.2d 493 (Supreme Court of Virginia, 1988)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
8 F.3d 817, 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 34728, 1993 WL 455322, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ralph-e-facemire-v-resolution-trust-corporation-ca4-1993.