Ralph Castillo Hawkins and Doug Coston, Individually and D/B/A Magnet Construction Company v. Anthony Robert Tidrick

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedOctober 25, 2001
Docket13-01-00496-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Ralph Castillo Hawkins and Doug Coston, Individually and D/B/A Magnet Construction Company v. Anthony Robert Tidrick (Ralph Castillo Hawkins and Doug Coston, Individually and D/B/A Magnet Construction Company v. Anthony Robert Tidrick) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ralph Castillo Hawkins and Doug Coston, Individually and D/B/A Magnet Construction Company v. Anthony Robert Tidrick, (Tex. Ct. App. 2001).

Opinion


NUMBER 13-01-496-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI

____________________________________________________________________

RALPH CASTILLO HAWKINS, ET AL. , Appellants,

v.



ANTHONY ROBERT TIDRICK , Appellee.

____________________________________________________________________

On appeal from the 24th District Court

of Victoria County, Texas.

____________________________________________________________________

O P I N I O N



Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Hinojosa and Yañez

Opinion Per Curiam

Appellants, RALPH CASTILLO HAWKINS, ET AL. , perfected an appeal from a judgment entered by the 24th District Court of Victoria County, Texas, in cause number 98-6-52,133-A . After the record was filed, the parties filed a joint motion to vacate the trial court's judgment and to dismiss. In the motion, the parties state that the parties have entered into a settlement agreement and release that disposes of the controversy made the basis of this cause. The parties state that because the appeal and the underlying cause are now moot, the proper appellate disposition is an order vacating the court's judgment and dismissing the cause.

The Court, having considered the documents on file and the joint motion to vacate the trial court's judgment and to dismiss, is of the opinion that the motion should be granted. The joint motion to vacate the trial court's judgment and to dismiss is granted. The judgment of the trial court is VACATED, and the cause is DISMISSED.

PER CURIAM

Do not publish.

Tex. R. App. P. 47.3.

Opinion delivered and filed this

the 25th day of October, 2001 .

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Ralph Castillo Hawkins and Doug Coston, Individually and D/B/A Magnet Construction Company v. Anthony Robert Tidrick, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ralph-castillo-hawkins-and-doug-coston-individuall-texapp-2001.