Ralph C. Shipp v. United States

966 F.2d 1444, 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 22099, 1992 WL 132565
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedJune 12, 1992
Docket92-6349
StatusUnpublished

This text of 966 F.2d 1444 (Ralph C. Shipp v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ralph C. Shipp v. United States, 966 F.2d 1444, 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 22099, 1992 WL 132565 (4th Cir. 1992).

Opinion

966 F.2d 1444

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Ralph C. SHIPP, Defendant-Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee.

No. 92-6349.

United States Court of Appeals,
Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: June 1, 1992
Decided: June 12, 1992

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Clarksburg. William M. Kidd, Senior District Judge. (CR-88-102-K, CA-92-9-E-K)

Ralph C. Shipp, Appellant Pro Se.

William Anthony Kolibash, United States Attorney, Elkins, West Virginia, for Appellee.

N.D.W.Va.

AFFIRMED.

Before PHILLIPS, WILKINSON, and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges.

OPINION

PER CURIAM:

Ralph C. Shipp appeals from the district court's orders refusing relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1988), and denying his motion for reconsideration. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit and that the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion for reconsideration. See United States v. Polk, 905 F.2d 54 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 59 U.S.L.W. 3391 (U.S. 1990). Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Shipp, Nos. CR-88-102-K, CA-92-9-E-K (N.D.W. Va. Jan. 22 and Feb. 13, 1992). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Oscar Theodore Polk, III
905 F.2d 54 (Fourth Circuit, 1990)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
966 F.2d 1444, 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 22099, 1992 WL 132565, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ralph-c-shipp-v-united-states-ca4-1992.