Ralph Alexander-El v. Robert Miller Casey Campbell Andrew Luther Ronald F. Moats Jon P. Galley

23 F.3d 399, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 18444, 1994 WL 199115
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedMay 20, 1994
Docket94-6201
StatusPublished

This text of 23 F.3d 399 (Ralph Alexander-El v. Robert Miller Casey Campbell Andrew Luther Ronald F. Moats Jon P. Galley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ralph Alexander-El v. Robert Miller Casey Campbell Andrew Luther Ronald F. Moats Jon P. Galley, 23 F.3d 399, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 18444, 1994 WL 199115 (4th Cir. 1994).

Opinion

23 F.3d 399
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Ralph ALEXANDER-EL, Plaintiff Appellant,
v.
Robert MILLER; Casey Campbell; Andrew Luther; Ronald F.
Moats; Jon P. Galley, Defendants Appellees.

No. 94-6201.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted April 21, 1994.
Decided May 20, 1994.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Frederic N. Smalkin, District Judge. (CA-93-2902)

Ralph Alexander-El, appellant pro se.

John Joseph Curran, Jr., Atty. Gen., Audrey J.S. Carrion, Office of the Attorney General of Maryland, Baltimore, MD, for appellees.

D.Md.

AFFIRMED.

Before ERVIN, Chief Judge, MICHAEL, Circuit Judge, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Alexander-El v. Miller, No. CA-93-2902 (D.Md. Feb. 17, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
23 F.3d 399, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 18444, 1994 WL 199115, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ralph-alexander-el-v-robert-miller-casey-campbell--ca4-1994.