Rall v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Rall v. State

910 S.W.2d 790, 1995 Mo. App. LEXIS 1922, 1995 WL 686558

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedNovember 21, 1995

DocketNo. 68032

StatusPublished

This text of 910 S.W.2d 790 (Rall v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Rall v. State, 910 S.W.2d 790, 1995 Mo. App. LEXIS 1922, 1995 WL 686558 (Mo. Ct. App. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

KAROHL, Judge.

Rickie Lee Rail appeals after a dismissal of his untimely Rule 24.035 motion for post conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing.

Rail contends the time constraints under Rule 24.035 are unconstitutional and deprive him of due process. He acknowledges he was delivered to the Department of Corrections on August 26, 1994, to serve his sentences for burglary and stealing. The Rule 24.035 motion was filed on December 7,1994.

A movant has ninety days after being delivered to the Department of Corrections to file a motion to vacate, set aside or correct the judgment or sentence. Rule 24.035(b). Failure to timely file constitutes a complete waiver. Rule 24.035(b). Time limitations for filing post conviction relief have been upheld as mandatory and constitutional. Day v. State, 770 S.W.2d 692, 696 (Mo. banc 1989). The time limitations do not violate a movant’s right to due process. Kendrick v. State, 804 S.W.2d 386, 387 (Mo.App.1991).

We affirm.

REINHARD, P.J., and CRANDALL, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

KAROHL, Judge.

Rickie Lee Rail appeals after a dismissal of his untimely Rule 24.035 motion for post conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing.

Rail contends the time constraints under Rule 24.035 are unconstitutional and deprive him of due process. He acknowledges he was delivered to the Department of Corrections on August 26, 1994, to serve his sentences for burglary and stealing. The Rule 24.035 motion was filed on December 7,1994.

A movant has ninety days after being delivered to the Department of Corrections to file a motion to vacate, set aside or correct the judgment or sentence. Rule 24.035(b). Failure to timely file constitutes a complete waiver. Rule 24.035(b). Time limitations for filing post conviction relief have been upheld as mandatory and constitutional. Day v. State, 770 S.W.2d 692, 696 (Mo. banc 1989). The time limitations do not violate a movant’s right to due process. Kendrick v. State, 804 S.W.2d 386, 387 (Mo.App.1991).

We affirm.

REINHARD, P.J., and CRANDALL, J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

910 S.W.2d 790, 1995 Mo. App. LEXIS 1922, 1995 WL 686558, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rall-v-state-moctapp-1995.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack