Raley v. State

158 S.E. 359, 43 Ga. App. 204, 1931 Ga. App. LEXIS 249
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided April 14, 1931·No. 21212·Published

Opinion

Bloodworth, J.

1. The only special ground of the motion for a new trial alleges error by the judge in not declaring a mistrial upon the ground of “improper argument of the solicitor-general.” This ground of the motion is not unqualifiedly approved by the judge, and under numerous decisions of the appellate courts of this State this court is not called upon to consider this ground. Jarrett v. State, 41 Ga. App. 840 (155 S. E. 49), and cases cited therein.

2. In Humphrey v. State, 39 Ga. App. 406 (147 S. E. 402), this court held: “A verdict supported by any evidence and approved by the trial judge can not be set aside by this court because of conflicting evidence or alleged insufficiency of evidence.” There was some evidence to support the verdict in this case, and the verdict is approved by the trial judge.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, O. J., and) Luke, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Raley v. State, 158 S.E. 359, 43 Ga. App. 204, 1931 Ga. App. LEXIS 249 (Ga. Ct. App. 1931).

158 S.E. 359 (Raley v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Humphrey v. State
147 S.E. 402 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1929)
Jarrett v. State
155 S.E. 49 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1930)