Raley v. Ohio

Supreme Court

Raley v. Ohio

354 U.S. 929, 77 S. Ct. 1391

Supreme Court of the United States·Decided June 24, 1957·No. No. 306·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam:

The judgment of the Supreme Court of Ohio is vacated and the case is remanded for consideration in the light of Sweezy v. New Hampshire, 354 U. S. 234, and Watkins v. United States, 354 U. S. 178.

Mr. Justice Burton would note probable jurisdiction and set the case for argument. Mr. Justice Clark dissents from this disposition of the case for the reasons stated in his dissenting opinions in Sweezy v. New Hampshire and Watkins v. United States, supra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam:

The judgment of the Supreme Court of Ohio is vacated and the case is remanded for consideration in the light of Sweezy v. New Hampshire, 354 U. S. 234, and Watkins v. United States, 354 U. S. 178.

Mr. Justice Burton would note probable jurisdiction and set the case for argument. Mr. Justice Clark dissents from this disposition of the case for the reasons stated in his dissenting opinions in Sweezy v. New Hampshire and Watkins v. United States, supra.

Raley v. Ohio, 354 U.S. 929, 77 S. Ct. 1391 (1957).

Pincite

354 U.S. 929 (Raley v. Ohio) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related