Raley v. Ohio

Supreme Court

Raley v. Ohio

354 U.S. 929, 77 S. Ct. 1391

CourtSupreme Court of the United States

DecidedJune 24, 1957

DocketNo. 306

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 354 U.S. 929 (Raley v. Ohio) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Raley v. Ohio, 354 U.S. 929, 77 S. Ct. 1391 (1957).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam:

The judgment of the Supreme Court of Ohio is vacated and the case is remanded for consideration in the light of Sweezy v. New Hampshire, 354 U. S. 234, and Watkins v. United States, 354 U. S. 178.

Mr. Justice Burton would note probable jurisdiction and set the case for argument. Mr. Justice Clark dissents from this disposition of the case for the reasons stated in his dissenting opinions in Sweezy v. New Hampshire and Watkins v. United States, supra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam:

The judgment of the Supreme Court of Ohio is vacated and the case is remanded for consideration in the light of Sweezy v. New Hampshire, 354 U. S. 234, and Watkins v. United States, 354 U. S. 178.

Mr. Justice Burton would note probable jurisdiction and set the case for argument. Mr. Justice Clark dissents from this disposition of the case for the reasons stated in his dissenting opinions in Sweezy v. New Hampshire and Watkins v. United States, supra.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

354 U.S. 929, 77 S. Ct. 1391, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/raley-v-ohio-scotus-1957.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack