Raleigh v. State
This text of 27 S.W.2d 158 (Raleigh v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Conviction is for selling intoxicating liquor, punishment being one and a half years in the penitentiary.
The record contains no bills of exception complaining of any proceeding during the [159]*159trial. The document brought forward which purports to be a statement of facts is not signed by the attorneys, nor approved by the trial judge. Without such approval the statement of facts cannot be considéred. Article 760, O. O. P.; Castellon v. State, 107 Tex. Cr. R. 7, 294 S. W. 557; Epple v. State, 109 Tex. Cr. R. 135, 3 S.W.(2d) 438. For other authorities, see note 24, under article 760, Yernon’s Ann. Cr. Statutes of Texas, C. C. P. vol. 3.
The judgment is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
27 S.W.2d 158, 1930 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1012, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/raleigh-v-state-texcrimapp-1930.