Raleigh v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Raleigh v. State

27 S.W.2d 158, 1930 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1012

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided April 23, 1930·No. No. 13281·Published

Opinion

HAWKINS, J.

Conviction is for selling intoxicating liquor, punishment being one and a half years in the penitentiary.

The record contains no bills of exception complaining of any proceeding during the [159]*159trial. The document brought forward which purports to be a statement of facts is not signed by the attorneys, nor approved by the trial judge. Without such approval the statement of facts cannot be considéred. Article 760, O. O. P.; Castellon v. State, 107 Tex. Cr. R. 7, 294 S. W. 557; Epple v. State, 109 Tex. Cr. R. 135, 3 S.W.(2d) 438. For other authorities, see note 24, under article 760, Yernon’s Ann. Cr. Statutes of Texas, C. C. P. vol. 3.

The judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

HAWKINS, J.

Conviction is for selling intoxicating liquor, punishment being one and a half years in the penitentiary.

The record contains no bills of exception complaining of any proceeding during the [159]*159trial. The document brought forward which purports to be a statement of facts is not signed by the attorneys, nor approved by the trial judge. Without such approval the statement of facts cannot be considéred. Article 760, O. O. P.; Castellon v. State, 107 Tex. Cr. R. 7, 294 S. W. 557; Epple v. State, 109 Tex. Cr. R. 135, 3 S.W.(2d) 438. For other authorities, see note 24, under article 760, Yernon’s Ann. Cr. Statutes of Texas, C. C. P. vol. 3.

The judgment is affirmed.

Raleigh v. State, 27 S.W.2d 158, 1930 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1012 (Tex. 1930).

Pincite

27 S.W.2d 158 (Raleigh v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related