Raleigh v. State

1931 OK CR 179, 297 P. 1060, 50 Okla. Crim. 345, 1931 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 169
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Raleigh v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 52 Okla. Crim. 388
Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma·Decided April 11, 1931·No. No. A-7777.·Published

Opinion

DAVENPORT, P. J.

Tbe plaintiff in error, hereinafter called defendant, was convicted of larceny of domestic animals, and was sentenced to serve four years in tbe state penitentiary.

Tbe case was tried in September, 1929, and tbe appeal lodged in this court in March, 1930. No briefs in support of tbe appeal have been filed, nor was there any appearance for oral argument at the time tbe case was submitted.

*346 Where an appeal is prosecuted to this court, and no brief in support of the petition in error is filed, and no appearance for oral argument made, this court will examine the record for jurisdictional errors, and will read the evidence to ascertain if it reasonably supports the judgment, and, if no fundamental error is apparent, and the evidence is sufficient, the case will be affirmed.

The case is affirmed.

CHAPPELL, J., concurs. EDWARDS, J., absent, not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Raleigh v. State, 1931 OK CR 179, 297 P. 1060, 50 Okla. Crim. 345, 1931 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 169 (Okla. Ct. App. 1931).

1931 OK CR 179 (Raleigh v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.