Raleigh v. Earle

39 A. 1117, 185 Pa. 78, 1898 Pa. LEXIS 672
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided March 21, 1898·No. Appeal, No. 318·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam,

Wo find no error in this decree. It is predicated of the facts correctly found by the learned court below, and we are all of opinion that it should not be disturbed. There is nothing in either of the specifications of error that requires discussion.

The decree is affirmed and appeal dismissed at appellants’ costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Raleigh v. Earle, 39 A. 1117, 185 Pa. 78, 1898 Pa. LEXIS 672 (Pa. 1898).

39 A. 1117 (Raleigh v. Earle) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Stetson v. Stetson
50 Pa. D. & C.2d 324 (Chester County Court of Common Pleas, 1970)