Raleigh Industries of America, Inc. v. United States

U.S. Customs Court

Raleigh Industries of America, Inc. v. United States

61 Cust. Ct. 647, 1968 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1753

CourtUnited States Customs Court

DecidedSeptember 16, 1968

DocketNo. P68/390; protest 62/18595-13045 (Chicago.)

StatusPublished

This text of 61 Cust. Ct. 647 (Raleigh Industries of America, Inc. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Raleigh Industries of America, Inc. v. United States, 61 Cust. Ct. 647, 1968 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1753 (cusc 1968).

Pincite

Opinion

Rao, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protest consists of bicycles with or without tires having wheels in diameter (measured to the outer circumference of the tire) over 25 inches, weighing less than 36 pounds complete without accessories, and not designed for use with tires having a cross-sectional diameter exceeding 1% inches and that the merchandise and issues herein are similar in all material respecte to those the subject of United States v. Schmidt Pritchard & Co., Manffano Cycles Co. (47 CCPA 152, C.A.D. 750), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rao, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protest consists of bicycles with or without tires having wheels in diameter (measured to the outer circumference of the tire) over 25 inches, weighing less than 36 pounds complete without accessories, and not designed for use with tires having a cross-sectional diameter exceeding 1% inches and that the merchandise and issues herein are similar in all material respecte to those the subject of United States v. Schmidt Pritchard & Co., Manffano Cycles Co. (47 CCPA 152, C.A.D. 750), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

61 Cust. Ct. 647, 1968 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1753, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/raleigh-industries-of-america-inc-v-united-states-cusc-1968.