Ralby v. Farm Stores, Inc.

207 So. 2d 429
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedJanuary 31, 1968
DocketNo. 36531
StatusPublished

This text of 207 So. 2d 429 (Ralby v. Farm Stores, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ralby v. Farm Stores, Inc., 207 So. 2d 429 (Fla. 1968).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

By petition for a writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date May 19, 1967.

We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is, therefore, dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 32 F.S.A.

Our consideration of the petition, the record and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law.

The petition is, therefore, denied.

The petition for attorneys’ fees is also denied.

THOMAS, Acting C. J., and ROBERTS, DREW, THORNAL and ERVIN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
207 So. 2d 429, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ralby-v-farm-stores-inc-fla-1968.