Rakowitz v. United States
Opinion
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
ARTHUR RAKOWITZ, Plaintiff-Appellant,
V.
UNITED STATES, Defendant-Appellee.
2012-5038 ~
Appeal from the United States Court of Federal Claims in case n0. 11-CV-391, Judge Christine O.C. Miller.
ON MOTION
ORDER
Arthur Rakowitz submits a "motion for leave to file protective order.” The United States opposes.
The United States Court of Federal Claims issued a protective order in this matter on Septernber 20, 2011. Ordinarily, this court’s review is limited to the record before the Court of Federal Claims. See Fed. R. App. P.
RAKOWITZ V. US 2
10(a). If any materials filed below were subject to the Court of Federal Claim’s protective order, this court’s rules provide that parties must file both a confidential and non-confidential set of briefs and appendices, which are not made available to the public. See Fed. Cir. R. 28(d) and 30(h). To the extent that Rakowitz argues that an additional protective order is required, that motion is denied.
Accordingly, IT Is ORDERED THAT:
The motion is denied.
FoR THE CoURT MAY 0 1 2012 /s/ Jan Horbaly Date Jan Horbaly ' Clerk
cc: Arthur Rakowitz Barbara Thomas, Esq.
s19
FILED u.s. count 01= AFPEALS son me FEDEHAL cincurr
MAY U 7 2012
JAN HURBALY CLERK
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Rakowitz v. United States (Rakowitz v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.