Rakowitz v. Bernheimer & Schwartz Brewing Co.

148 N.Y.S. 258

This text of 148 N.Y.S. 258 (Rakowitz v. Bernheimer & Schwartz Brewing Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Rakowitz v. Bernheimer & Schwartz Brewing Co., 148 N.Y.S. 258 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1914).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The only question raised at the trial of this case was as to whether or not one Applebaum, who was authorized to act for defendant, and with whom the plaintiffs claim an agreement- was made to pay the rent sued for, had power to make a lease binding on the defendant, and whether or not such a lease was made. Upon these questions testimony was given from which the jury might have found in favor of the plaintiffs. It was therefore error to direct a verdict for the defendant.

Judgment reversed, and new trial granted, with costs to appellants to abide the event.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
148 N.Y.S. 258, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rakowitz-v-bernheimer-schwartz-brewing-co-nyappterm-1914.