Rakower Law PLLC v. Berner

S.D. New York

Rakower Law PLLC v. Berner

DecidedNovember 29, 2022

Docket1:21-cv-06439

StatusUnknown

This text of Rakower Law PLLC v. Berner (Rakower Law PLLC v. Berner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, S.D. New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Rakower Law PLLC v. Berner, (S.D.N.Y. 2022).

Pincite

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK -------------------------------------------------------------x : RAKOWER LAW PLLC, : Plaintiff, : 21-cv-6439 (PGG) (OTW) : -against- : ORDER : RICARDO BERNER and PRACTIKO, LLC, : : Defendants. : -------------------------------------------------------------x ONA T. WANG, United States Magistrate Judge: The Court has reviewed ECF Nos. 89 and 91. Because Plaintiff did not break down the costs associated with its fees and expenses request, the Court declines to issue sanctions against Defendants at this time. See Korzeniewski v. Sapa Pho Vietnamese Rest. Inc., No. 17-CV- 5721 (MKB) (SJB), 2019 WL 312149, at *12 (E.D.N.Y. Jan. 3, 2019), report and recommendation adopted, No. 17-CV-05721 (MKB) (SJB), 2019 WL 291145 (E.D.N.Y. Jan. 23, 2019) (denying motion for attorney’s fees where motion was not supported by adequate documentation). The Court reminds the parties that any request to adjourn future conferences before the Court must be made in a timely fashion. SO ORDERED.

s/ Ona T. Wang Dated: November 29, 2022 Ona T. Wang New York, New York United States Magistrate Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK -------------------------------------------------------------x : RAKOWER LAW PLLC, : Plaintiff, : 21-cv-6439 (PGG) (OTW) : -against- : ORDER : RICARDO BERNER and PRACTIKO, LLC, : : Defendants. : -------------------------------------------------------------x ONA T. WANG, United States Magistrate Judge: The Court has reviewed ECF Nos. 89 and 91. Because Plaintiff did not break down the costs associated with its fees and expenses request, the Court declines to issue sanctions against Defendants at this time. See Korzeniewski v. Sapa Pho Vietnamese Rest. Inc., No. 17-CV- 5721 (MKB) (SJB), 2019 WL 312149, at *12 (E.D.N.Y. Jan. 3, 2019), report and recommendation adopted, No. 17-CV-05721 (MKB) (SJB), 2019 WL 291145 (E.D.N.Y. Jan. 23, 2019) (denying motion for attorney’s fees where motion was not supported by adequate documentation). The Court reminds the parties that any request to adjourn future conferences before the Court must be made in a timely fashion. SO ORDERED.

s/ Ona T. Wang Dated: November 29, 2022 Ona T. Wang New York, New York United States Magistrate Judge

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Rakower Law PLLC v. Berner, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rakower-law-pllc-v-berner-nysd-2022.