Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/RAKOSKI v. State

RAKOSKI v. State

37 So. 3d 391, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 8774, 2010 WL 2425982
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJune 18, 2010
Docket5D09-813
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 37 So. 3d 391 (RAKOSKI v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
RAKOSKI v. State, 37 So. 3d 391, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 8774, 2010 WL 2425982 (Fla. Ct. App. 2010).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Tina Marie Rakoski appeals her sentence and the denial of her motion to correct sentence. We affirm without discussion, except as to condition number 30 of Rakoski’s community control order. We strike condition 30 as the statute cited as authority for the assessment of this cost, section 948.02, Florida Statutes, was renumbered in 1977 as section 945.26, Florida Statutes (1977), which in turn was repealed in 1985. See Ch. 85-288 § 27, Laws of Fla.

AFFIRMED AS MODIFIED.

GRIFFIN, ORFINGER and COHEN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Warr v. State
37 So. 3d 391 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2010)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
37 So. 3d 391, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 8774, 2010 WL 2425982, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rakoski-v-state-fladistctapp-2010.