Rakestraw v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Rakestraw v. State

1912 OK CR 255, 120 P. 1130, 7 Okla. Crim. 703, 1912 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 45

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

DecidedFebruary 3, 1912

DocketNo. A-1329.

StatusPublished

This text of 1912 OK CR 255 (Rakestraw v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Rakestraw v. State, 1912 OK CR 255, 120 P. 1130, 7 Okla. Crim. 703, 1912 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 45 (Okla. Ct. App. 1912).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiffs in- error were convicted at the April, 1911, term of the county court of Oklahoma county, on a charge of having the unlawful possession of intoxicating liquor for the purpose of sale, and were each sentenced to pay a fine of five hundred dollars and serve six months in the county jail. Finding no error prejudicial to the substantial rights of the plaintiffs in error, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiffs in- error were convicted at the April, 1911, term of the county court of Oklahoma county, on a charge of having the unlawful possession of intoxicating liquor for the purpose of sale, and were each sentenced to pay a fine of five hundred dollars and serve six months in the county jail. Finding no error prejudicial to the substantial rights of the plaintiffs in error, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1912 OK CR 255, 120 P. 1130, 7 Okla. Crim. 703, 1912 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 45, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rakestraw-v-state-oklacrimapp-1912.