Rakestraw v. Arkansas Best Corp.

320 S.E.2d 639, 171 Ga. App. 364, 1984 Ga. App. LEXIS 2203
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided June 26, 1984·No. 68683·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Benham, Judge.

“ ‘The parties having agreed upon a compromise of the pending cause, and to carry it out, it being necessary to have the judgment of the superior court affirming the award of the [State Board of Workers’ Compensation] reversed and the case remanded to the [State Board of Workers’ Compensation] for the purpose of effecting the settlement agreed on, and the parties having consented to this act by agreement filed, this court, without looking into the record, will reverse the judgment of the court below so as to carry out the compromise. [Cits.] It is so ordered.’ ” Norton v. Liberty Mut. Ins. Co., 125 Ga. App. 278 (187 SE2d 337) (1972). The trial court is directed to remand this case to the State Board of Workers’ Compensation for the purpose of perfecting the settlement.

Judgment reversed with direction.

Banke, P. J., and Pope, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rakestraw v. Arkansas Best Corp., 320 S.E.2d 639, 171 Ga. App. 364, 1984 Ga. App. LEXIS 2203 (Ga. Ct. App. 1984).

320 S.E.2d 639 (Rakestraw v. Arkansas Best Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Charter Hr, Inc. v. Krystal Perry
Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2013
Charter HR, Inc. v. Perry
739 S.E.2d 770 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2013)