Rakesh Verma v. State of Florida

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedFebruary 2, 2017
Docket16-5389
StatusPublished

This text of Rakesh Verma v. State of Florida (Rakesh Verma v. State of Florida) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Rakesh Verma v. State of Florida, (Fla. Ct. App. 2017).

Opinion

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

RAKESH VERMA, NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND Petitioner, DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

v. CASE NO. 1D16-5389

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Respondent. ___________________________/

Opinion filed February 3, 2017.

Petition for Writ of Prohibition -- Original Jurisdiction.

Rakesh Verma, pro se, Petitioner.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of prohibition is dismissed as unauthorized. See Logan v.

State, 846 So. 2d 472 (Fla. 2004).

ROBERTS, C.J., WOLF and B.L. THOMAS, JJ., CONCUR.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Logan v. State
846 So. 2d 472 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2003)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Rakesh Verma v. State of Florida, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rakesh-verma-v-state-of-florida-fladistctapp-2017.