Rakes v. State

175 A.2d 579, 227 Md. 172, 1961 Md. LEXIS 579
CourtCourt of Appeals of Maryland
DecidedDecember 7, 1961
Docket[No. 88, September Term, 1961.]
StatusPublished
Cited by6 cases

This text of 175 A.2d 579 (Rakes v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Maryland primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Rakes v. State, 175 A.2d 579, 227 Md. 172, 1961 Md. LEXIS 579 (Md. 1961).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The two defendants, brothers, Larry K. Rakes and Lester R. Rakes, were charged with assault upon Trooper Fields of the Maryland State Police. They were tried in the Circuit Court for Cecil County before Judges Rollins and Rasin, sitting without a jury, were found guilty and were each sentenced to five years’ imprisonment. They appeal.

The appellants’ only contention is that the evidence was insufficient to warrant their convictions. The victim of the assault was an off-duty State trooper who went to investigate an apparent robbery of a food store opposite his home at 1:30 o’clock one morning. He was severely beaten and seriously injured by two or more of a group of five young men of which the appellants were members. He testified, among other things, that he knew both of these defendants, that he was badly injured in the affray, that although he was not certain who had delivered some of the blows and kicks which he received, each of the appellants had struck him. The appellants denied it, but their testimony and that of two of their companions (the third was not present at the trial, having apparently escaped) was, to say the best of it, very vague.

The trial judges found that the State had met the burden of proving its case against the defendants beyond a reasonable doubt. The credibility of the witnesses was for the trial court and the positive testimony of one eye-witness, the victim, if believed (as it evidently was), was ample to sustain the convictions. Booth v. State, 225 Md. 71, 169 A. 2d 388; Booker v. State, 225 Md. 183, 170 A. 2d 203.

Judgments affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Evans
656 A.2d 329 (Court of Special Appeals of Maryland, 1995)
Branch v. State
502 A.2d 496 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1986)
Walters v. State
218 A.2d 678 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1966)
Ware v. State
200 A.2d 664 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1964)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
175 A.2d 579, 227 Md. 172, 1961 Md. LEXIS 579, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rakes-v-state-md-1961.