Rajpal Singh v. Scarlet Grant, et al.
This text of Rajpal Singh v. Scarlet Grant, et al. (Rajpal Singh v. Scarlet Grant, et al.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, W.D. Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA
RAJPAL SINGH, ) ) Petitioner, ) ) vs. ) Case No. CIV-26-606-R ) SCARLET GRANT, et al., ) ) Respondents. )
ORDER
Petitioner, proceeding with counsel, filed a Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 asserting that his his bond determination hearing was constitutionally and procedurally defective. Petitioner subsequently filed a Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 in Case No. CIV-26-863-R which asserts the same claims. Since the instant Petition challenges the same detention and requests the same relief as the Petition in CIV-26-863, the instant Petition is subject to dismissal for being duplicative. See Mitchell v. Gunja, 76 F. App’x 865, 867 (10th Cir. 2003) (dismissing § 2241 claim for duplicating already-pending § 2241 claim). Accordingly, the Petition in this action is dismissed and Petitioner may proceed with his claim in CIV-26-863-R. IT IS SO ORDERED this 2"! day of June, 2026.
DAVID L. RUSSELL UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Rajpal Singh v. Scarlet Grant, et al., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rajpal-singh-v-scarlet-grant-et-al-okwd-2026.