Rajkovic v. Market, Inc.

Opinion

USCA1 Opinion

[NOT FOR PUBLICATION]



                            UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

                                FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT



                                 ____________________


No. 96-1593



                                  LJUBICA RAJKOVIC,



                                Plaintiff, Appellant,



                                          v.



                           LAVERDE'S MARKET, INC., ET AL.,



                                Defendants, Appellees.



                                 ____________________


APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT



                          FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS



                     [Hon. Joseph L. Tauro, U.S. District Judge]
                                            ___________________



                                 ____________________



                                        Before



                                Torruella, Chief Judge,
                                           ___________

                            Cyr and Stahl, Circuit Judges.
                                           ______________



                                 ____________________



            Ljubica Rajkovic on brief pro se.
            ________________

            John  Foskett, Marnie  J. Wortzman,  and Deutsch  Williams  Brooks
            _____________  ___________________       _________________________

        DeRensis  Holland &  Drachman,  P.C. on  brief for  appellee Laverde's
        ____________________________________

        Market, Inc.


____________________



                                  November 14, 1996

                                 ____________________



Per Curiam.  We  have reviewed the record in  this case,
                 __________



            including the briefs of the parties and the memorandum of the



            district  court.   We  agree  with  the district  court  that



            plaintiff/appellant  has failed to allege sufficient facts to



            support   her  allegations   that  she   suffered  employment



            discrimination.     Hence,   her  complaints   were  properly



            dismissed.



                 Affirmed. See 1st Cir. Loc. R. 27.1.
                 ________  ___


-2-