RAJIV A. GRAY v. STATE OF FLORIDA

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 12, 2022·No. 22-1046·Published

Opinion

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT

RAJIV GRAY, Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee.

No. 4D22-1046

[October 12, 2022]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County; Nickolaus H. Davis, Judge; L.T. Case Nos. 08-5164CF10A. 08-8433CF10A,08-9624CF10A, 08- 15443CF10A and 09-6445CF10A.

Rajiv Gray, Milton, pro se.

No appearance filed for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Newman v. State, 49 So. 3d 843, 845 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010) (“Assuming that a deficiency existed in the temporary appointment of the county court judge to the circuit court, this provides no basis for postconviction relief. Jurisdiction is determined by the court, not the judge.”) (citations omitted).

WARNER, DAMOORGIAN and GERBER, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

RAJIV A. GRAY v. STATE OF FLORIDA, (Fla. Ct. App. 2022).

RAJIV A. GRAY v. STATE OF FLORIDA (RAJIV A. GRAY v. STATE OF FLORIDA) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Newman v. State
49 So. 3d 843 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2010)