Raji v. Nejad

256 A.D.2d 12, 680 N.Y.S.2d 520, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12784
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 1, 1998·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (David Saxe, J.), entered July 14, 1997, which, insofar as appealed from, granted defendant’s motion to dismiss, for failure to state a cause of action, so much of the complaint as seeks to [13]*13recover gifts that plaintiff gave defendant in contemplation of marriage, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

The causes of action under Civil Rights Law § 80-b to recover gifts in contemplation of a marriage that did not occur were properly dismissed on the ground that plaintiff was married at the time the gifts were made, and it does not avail plaintiff that his divorce action was pending at the time (Lowe v Quinn, 27 NY2d 397). Concur — Milonas, J. P., Ellerin, Rubin and Mazzarelli, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Raji v. Nejad, 256 A.D.2d 12, 680 N.Y.S.2d 520, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12784 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1998).

256 A.D.2d 12 (Raji v. Nejad) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Lipschutz v. Kiderman
76 A.D.2d 178 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2010)