Rajabian v. Rajabian

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Rajabian v. Rajabian

275 A.D.2d 787, 714 N.Y.S.2d 227, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9394

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedSeptember 25, 2000

StatusPublished

This text of 275 A.D.2d 787 (Rajabian v. Rajabian) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Rajabian v. Rajabian, 275 A.D.2d 787, 714 N.Y.S.2d 227, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9394 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

Pincite

Opinion

—In a child custody proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 6, the petitioner appeals, by permission, from an order of the Family Court, Queens County (Bogacz, J.), dated January 4, 1999, which vacated an order of filiation dated June 30, 1998.

Ordered that the appeal is dismissed as academic, without costs or disbursements.

As conceded by the appellant, on April 29, 1999, a judgment of divorce was entered in favor of the appellant and against the respondent adjudicating the child an issue of the parties’ marriage. Accordingly, the appeal from the order dated January 4, 1999, is dismissed as academic.

The petitioner also purportedly appeals from an order of the Family Court, Queens County, dated June 30, 1998, which dismissed her petition upon her default in appearing at the hearing on the petition. We note that no notice of appeal from this order was filed, and, in any event, no appeal lies from an order entered upon the default of the appealing party (see, CPLR 5511). Ritter, J. P., Thompson, Krausman and Gold-stein, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—In a child custody proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 6, the petitioner appeals, by permission, from an order of the Family Court, Queens County (Bogacz, J.), dated January 4, 1999, which vacated an order of filiation dated June 30, 1998.

Ordered that the appeal is dismissed as academic, without costs or disbursements.

As conceded by the appellant, on April 29, 1999, a judgment of divorce was entered in favor of the appellant and against the respondent adjudicating the child an issue of the parties’ marriage. Accordingly, the appeal from the order dated January 4, 1999, is dismissed as academic.

The petitioner also purportedly appeals from an order of the Family Court, Queens County, dated June 30, 1998, which dismissed her petition upon her default in appearing at the hearing on the petition. We note that no notice of appeal from this order was filed, and, in any event, no appeal lies from an order entered upon the default of the appealing party (see, CPLR 5511). Ritter, J. P., Thompson, Krausman and Gold-stein, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

275 A.D.2d 787, 714 N.Y.S.2d 227, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9394, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rajabian-v-rajabian-nyappdiv-2000.