Raja v. Merscorp Inc.

585 F. App'x 201
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedNovember 20, 2014
DocketNo. 14-1719
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 585 F. App'x 201 (Raja v. Merscorp Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Raja v. Merscorp Inc., 585 F. App'x 201 (4th Cir. 2014).

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Mohammad Nawaz Raja and Neelum Nawaz Raja appeal the district court’s order dismissing without prejudice their civil action challenging the legality of a foreclosure proceeding. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Raja v. MERSCORP Inc., No. 1:13-cv-00944-LO-TRJ (E.D. Va. June 17, 2014). We deny Rajas’ motion to correct the record on appeal and we dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Raja v. Gorman
E.D. Virginia, 2024

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
585 F. App'x 201, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/raja-v-merscorp-inc-ca4-2014.