Raja v. Gonzales
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
A review of the record and the opening brief indicates that the questions raised in this appeal are so insubstantial as not to require further argument. See United, States v. Hooton, 693 F.2d 857, 858 (9th Cir.1982) (per curiam) (stating standard).
Accordingly, we grant appellees’ opposed motion for summary affirmance of the district court’s judgment.
All other pending motions are denied as moot.
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
189 F. App'x 595 (Raja v. Gonzales) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.