Raitport v. Ramirez

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Raitport v. Ramirez

202 A.D.2d 673, 610 N.Y.S.2d 846, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2904

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 28, 1994·Published

Opinion

—Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 in the nature of a writ of mandamus, to compel the respondent to recuse himself from presiding over two civil actions, and for related relief.

Adjudged that the petition is denied and the proceeding is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

The petitioner has demonstrated no clear legal right to the relief sought (see, Matter of Molea v Marasco, 64 NY2d 718). Sullivan, J. P., Rosenblatt, Copertino and Hart, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 in the nature of a writ of mandamus, to compel the respondent to recuse himself from presiding over two civil actions, and for related relief.

Adjudged that the petition is denied and the proceeding is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

The petitioner has demonstrated no clear legal right to the relief sought (see, Matter of Molea v Marasco, 64 NY2d 718). Sullivan, J. P., Rosenblatt, Copertino and Hart, JJ., concur.

Raitport v. Ramirez, 202 A.D.2d 673, 610 N.Y.S.2d 846, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2904 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

202 A.D.2d 673 (Raitport v. Ramirez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related