Raitport v. Ramirez
This text of 202 A.D.2d 673 (Raitport v. Ramirez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
—Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 in the nature of a writ of mandamus, to compel the respondent to recuse himself from presiding over two civil actions, and for related relief.
Adjudged that the petition is denied and the proceeding is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.
The petitioner has demonstrated no clear legal right to the relief sought (see, Matter of Molea v Marasco, 64 NY2d 718). Sullivan, J. P., Rosenblatt, Copertino and Hart, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
202 A.D.2d 673, 610 N.Y.S.2d 846, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2904, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/raitport-v-ramirez-nyappdiv-1994.