Raisin v. . Shoemaker
144 N.E. 921, 238 N.Y. 630, 1924 N.Y. LEXIS 814
This text of 144 N.E. 921 (Raisin v. . Shoemaker) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Raisin v. . Shoemaker, 144 N.E. 921, 238 N.Y. 630, 1924 N.Y. LEXIS 814 (N.Y. 1924).
Opinion
Order affirmed and judgment absolute ordered against appellant on the stipulation, with costs in all courts on the ground that the instrument of December 9, 1919, known as plaintiff’s Exhibit 7, was an agreement to give a lease of the premises 926 Prospect avenue and was not a lease; no opinion.
Concur: His cock, Ch. J., Cardozo, Pound, McLaughlin, Crane, Andrews and Lehman, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Scroll v. Commercial Trading Co.
52 A.D.2d 802 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1976)
Perkins v. Langdon
74 S.E.2d 634 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1953)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
144 N.E. 921, 238 N.Y. 630, 1924 N.Y. LEXIS 814, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/raisin-v-shoemaker-ny-1924.