Raisin v. . Shoemaker
144 N.E. 921, 238 N.Y. 630, 1924 N.Y. LEXIS 814
Opinion
Order affirmed and judgment absolute ordered against appellant on the stipulation, with costs in all courts on the ground that the instrument of December 9, 1919, known as plaintiff’s Exhibit 7, was an agreement to give a lease of the premises 926 Prospect avenue and was not a lease; no opinion.
Concur: His cock, Ch. J., Cardozo, Pound, McLaughlin, Crane, Andrews and Lehman, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Raisin v. . Shoemaker, 144 N.E. 921, 238 N.Y. 630, 1924 N.Y. LEXIS 814 (N.Y. 1924).
144 N.E. 921 (Raisin v. . Shoemaker) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Scroll v. Commercial Trading Co.
52 A.D.2d 802 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1976)
Perkins v. Langdon
74 S.E.2d 634 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1953)