Raisin v. Schechtman

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Raisin v. Schechtman

151 N.Y.S. 276

CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

DecidedJanuary 15, 1915

StatusPublished

This text of 151 N.Y.S. 276 (Raisin v. Schechtman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Raisin v. Schechtman, 151 N.Y.S. 276 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1915).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The court has no power to strike out portions of defendant’s answer as sham or frivolous which put in issue material allegations of the complaint. Schlesinger v. McDonald, 106 App. Div. 570, 94 N. Y. Supp. 721; Howe v. Elwell, 57 App. Div. 357, 67 N. Y. Supp. 1108; Alexander v. Aronson, 65 App. Div. 174, 72 N. Y. Supp. 640.

The order must therefore be reversed, with $10 costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with $10 costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The court has no power to strike out portions of defendant’s answer as sham or frivolous which put in issue material allegations of the complaint. Schlesinger v. McDonald, 106 App. Div. 570, 94 N. Y. Supp. 721; Howe v. Elwell, 57 App. Div. 357, 67 N. Y. Supp. 1108; Alexander v. Aronson, 65 App. Div. 174, 72 N. Y. Supp. 640.

The order must therefore be reversed, with $10 costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with $10 costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

151 N.Y.S. 276, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/raisin-v-schechtman-nyappterm-1915.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack