Raishbrook v. Estate of Bayley

Nevada Supreme Court

Raishbrook v. Estate of Bayley

528 P.2d 1331, 90 Nev. 415, 1974 Nev. LEXIS 412

CourtNevada Supreme Court

DecidedDecember 11, 1974

Docket7471

StatusPublished

Cited by8 cases

This text of 528 P.2d 1331 (Raishbrook v. Estate of Bayley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nevada Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Raishbrook v. Estate of Bayley, 528 P.2d 1331, 90 Nev. 415, 1974 Nev. LEXIS 412 (Neb. 1974).

Pincite

Opinion

OPINION

Per Curiam:

Because the record on appeal contains neither a transcript nor any statement of the evidence adduced in the court below, *416 which we deem essential to determination of contentions presented to us, the order appealed from is affirmed. When evidence on which a district court’s judgment rests is not properly included in the record on appeal, it is assumed that the record supports the lower court’s findings. NRAP 10; City of Las Vegas v. Bolden, 89 Nev. 526, 516 P.2d 110 (1973); Meakin v. Meakin, 88 Nev. 25, 492 P.2d 1304 (1972); Leeming v. Leeming, 87 Nev. 530, 490 P.2d 342 (1971); Pfister v. Shelton, 69 Nev. 309, 250 P.2d 239 (1952). 1

1

Appellant’s present counsel were substituted for prior counsel, to argue this appeal, after the time for docketing the record had passed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

OPINION

Per Curiam:

Because the record on appeal contains neither a transcript nor any statement of the evidence adduced in the court below, *416 which we deem essential to determination of contentions presented to us, the order appealed from is affirmed. When evidence on which a district court’s judgment rests is not properly included in the record on appeal, it is assumed that the record supports the lower court’s findings. NRAP 10; City of Las Vegas v. Bolden, 89 Nev. 526, 516 P.2d 110 (1973); Meakin v. Meakin, 88 Nev. 25, 492 P.2d 1304 (1972); Leeming v. Leeming, 87 Nev. 530, 490 P.2d 342 (1971); Pfister v. Shelton, 69 Nev. 309, 250 P.2d 239 (1952). 1

1

Appellant’s present counsel were substituted for prior counsel, to argue this appeal, after the time for docketing the record had passed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

528 P.2d 1331, 90 Nev. 415, 1974 Nev. LEXIS 412, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/raishbrook-v-estate-of-bayley-nev-1974.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack