Rais v. Thornburgh Construction Co.

California Court of Appeal

Rais v. Thornburgh Construction Co.

244 P.2d 741, 111 Cal. App. 2d 968, 1952 Cal. App. LEXIS 1321

CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal

DecidedMay 26, 1952

DocketCiv. No. 18715

StatusPublished

This text of 244 P.2d 741 (Rais v. Thornburgh Construction Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Rais v. Thornburgh Construction Co., 244 P.2d 741, 111 Cal. App. 2d 968, 1952 Cal. App. LEXIS 1321 (Cal. Ct. App. 1952).

Pincite

Opinion

HANSON, J. pro tem.

This is an appeal by Sam Rais, who as a minority stockholder of the Thornburgh Construction Company, sought in behalf of the corporation and was denied an accounting by Thornburg, his wife, and Thorn-burg’s bookkeeper, who was also a director of the corporation.

The case before us is a companion case to the basic case No. 18716, Thornburgh Construction Co., a corporation, v. College Heights Dev., this day decided, ante, p. 295 [244 P.2d 735]. The facts of the case are sufficiently recited in the basic case and hence need not here be repeated. In view of the conclusions we have arrived at in the basic case it is self-evident that the judgment in this case must as in the basic case be reversed.

White, P. J., and Doran, J., concurred.

A petition for a rehearing was denied June 16, 1952, and respondents’ petition for a hearing by the Supreme Court was denied July 24, 1952. Schauer, J., was of the opinion that the petition should be granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI