Rainwater v. Social Security Administration

District Court, D. New Mexico·Decided June 8, 2023·No. 2:22-cv-00547·Unknown

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO

MELINDA RAINWATER, Plaintiff, vs. CIV NO. 2:22-cv-00547-KG/KK

KILOLO KIJAKAZI, Acting Commissioner of Social Security,

Defendant.

ORDER Defendant’s Stipulated Motion for Fees Under the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA) is GRANTED. Defendant shall pay Plaintiff $8,000.00 in attorney fees. Payment of this amount shall constitute a complete release from and bar to any and all claims Plaintiff may have relating to EAJA fees in connection with this action. However, the EAJA award is without prejudice to Plaintiff’s attorney’s right to seek attorney fees pursuant to Social Security Act § 206(b), 42 U.S.C. § 406(b), subject to the offset provisions of the EAJA. See 28 U.S.C. § 2412(c)(1) (2006). Under Astrue v. Ratliff, 130 S. Ct 2521, 2528-29 (2010), EAJA fees awarded by this Court belong to the Plaintiff and are subject to offset under the Treasury Offset Program (31 U.S.C. § 3716(c)(3)(B) (2006)). This Court therefore orders the EAJA fees to be paid to Plaintiff. If, after receiving the Court’s EAJA fee order, the Commissioner (1) determines that Plaintiff has properly assigned her right to EAJA fees to her attorney; (2) determines that Plaintiff does not owe a debt that is subject to offset under the Treasury Offset Program; and (3) agrees to waive the requirements of the Anti-Assignment Act, then the EAJA fees will be made payable to Plaintiffs attorney, Konoski & Partners, P.C., and delivered to the address below. However, if there is a debt owed under the Treasury Offset Program, the Commissioner cannot agree to waive the requirements of the Anti-Assignment Act, and the remaining EAJA fees after offset will be paid by a check made out to Plaintiff but delivered to Plaintiffs attorney at the following address: KONOSKI & PARTNERS, P.C. 180 Tices Lane Suite 103, Building B East Brunswick, NJ 08816

and mZta— UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Submitted by: ALEXANDER M.M. UBALLEZ United States Attorney MANUEL LUCERO Assistant United States Attorney /s/ Filed Electronically 6/8/23 MARGARET SOBOTA ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANT Approved by: /s/ Electronically approved on 6/8/23! BRYAN KONOSKI ATTORNEY FOR PLAINTIFF

' Plaintiff's counsel provided consent to Defendant’s counsel to add his electronic signature to this stipulated EAJA motion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rainwater v. Social Security Administration, (D.N.M. 2023).

Rainwater v. Social Security Administration (Rainwater v. Social Security Administration) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Astrue v. Ratliff
560 U.S. 586 (Supreme Court, 2010)