Rains v. Westminster College

CourtDistrict Court, D. Utah
DecidedFebruary 7, 2023
Docket2:20-cv-00520
StatusUnknown

This text of Rains v. Westminster College (Rains v. Westminster College) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, D. Utah primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Rains v. Westminster College, (D. Utah 2023).

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH

EMILY SHARP RAINS, ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND Plaintiff, RECOMMENDATION

v. Case No. 2:20-cv-00520-JNP-DAO

WESTMINSTER COLLEGE; MELISSA District Judge Jill N. Parrish KOERNER; and RICHARD BADENHAUSEN,

Defendants.

Plaintiff Emily Rains (“Plaintiff”), proceeding pro se, sued Westminster College, Melissa Koerner, and Richard Badenhausen (collectively, “Defendants”). Plaintiff initially asserted claims only against Westminster College and Melissa Koerner. (ECF No. 8-2.) Plaintiff subsequently amended her complaint adding Richard Badenhausen as a defendant. (Id.). Magistrate Judge Daphne A. Oberg issued a Report and Recommendation that the action against Dr. Badenhausen be dismissed with prejudice as the statute of limitations for the defamation per se and false light invasion of privacy claims against asserted Dr. Badenhausen had expired. (ECF No. 109.) Judge Oberg notified Plaintiff that the failure to file a timely objection to the Report and Recommendation could result in the waiver of objections. Plaintiff did not file an objection within the allotted time. Because Plaintiff did not object to the Report and Recommendation, she waived any argument that it was in error. See United States v. One Parcel of Real Prop., 73 F.3d 1057, 1060 (10th Cir. 1996). The court will decline to apply the waiver rule only if “the interests of justice so dictate.” Moore v. United States, 950 F.2d 656, 659 (10th Cir. 1991). The court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation and concludes it is not clearly erroneous. Thus, the court finds that the interests of justice do not warrant deviation from the waiver rule. Accordingly, the court ORDERS as follows: 1. The Report and Recommendation for Dismissal of Richard Badenhausen (ECF No.

109) is ADOPTED IN FULL. 2. This action against Richard Badenhausen is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.

Signed February 7, 2023 BY THE COURT

______________________________ Jill N. Parrish United States District Court Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Dennis Wayne Moore v. United States
950 F.2d 656 (Tenth Circuit, 1991)
United States v. 2121 East 30th Street
73 F.3d 1057 (Tenth Circuit, 1996)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Rains v. Westminster College, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rains-v-westminster-college-utd-2023.