Rainford v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Rainford v. State

45 So. 3d 934, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 15547, 2010 WL 3984649

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedOctober 13, 2010

Docket4D08-4402

StatusPublished

This text of 45 So. 3d 934 (Rainford v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Rainford v. State, 45 So. 3d 934, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 15547, 2010 WL 3984649 (Fla. Ct. App. 2010).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm appellant’s conviction, and grant the public defender’s motion to withdraw pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). We remand, however, for the trial court to correct a scrivener’s error, so as to correctly reflect that appellant was convicted after a jury trial; he did not enter a plea of guilty.

Affirmed; Remanded with instructions.

WARNER, POLEN and LEVINE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We affirm appellant’s conviction, and grant the public defender’s motion to withdraw pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). We remand, however, for the trial court to correct a scrivener’s error, so as to correctly reflect that appellant was convicted after a jury trial; he did not enter a plea of guilty.

Affirmed; Remanded with instructions.

WARNER, POLEN and LEVINE, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

45 So. 3d 934, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 15547, 2010 WL 3984649, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rainford-v-state-fladistctapp-2010.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack