Rainey v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Rainey v. State

137 So. 924, 24 Ala. App. 676

CourtAlabama Court of Appeals

DecidedNovember 10, 1931

Docket4 Div. 826.

StatusPublished

This text of 137 So. 924 (Rainey v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Rainey v. State, 137 So. 924, 24 Ala. App. 676 (Ala. Ct. App. 1931).

Pincite

Opinion

BRICKEN, P. J.

This appeal is upon the record proper; there being no bill of exceptions. There was a general verdict of guilty as charged in the indictment. The indictment contained two counts charging appellant with distilling, etc., alcoholic, or spirituous liquors or beverages; and in the second count with the unlawful possession of a still to be used for that purpose. The court sentenced appellant to serve an indeterminate term of imprisonment in the penitentiary of not less than thirteen nor more than fifteen months. There is no error apparent on the record. The judgment of conviction in the lower court will stand affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BRICKEN, P. J.

This appeal is upon the record proper; there being no bill of exceptions. There was a general verdict of guilty as charged in the indictment. The indictment contained two counts charging appellant with distilling, etc., alcoholic, or spirituous liquors or beverages; and in the second count with the unlawful possession of a still to be used for that purpose. The court sentenced appellant to serve an indeterminate term of imprisonment in the penitentiary of not less than thirteen nor more than fifteen months. There is no error apparent on the record. The judgment of conviction in the lower court will stand affirmed.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

137 So. 924, 24 Ala. App. 676, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rainey-v-state-alactapp-1931.