Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Rainey v. Rainey

Rainey v. Rainey

702 So. 2d 306, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 14110, 1997 WL 777697
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedDecember 19, 1997
DocketNo. 97-419
StatusPublished

This text of 702 So. 2d 306 (Rainey v. Rainey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Rainey v. Rainey, 702 So. 2d 306, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 14110, 1997 WL 777697 (Fla. Ct. App. 1997).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Stanley Rainey, pro se, appeals from the order of the circuit judge refusing to disqualify him from presiding over Rainey’s divorce proceeding. We treat the notice of appeal as a petition for writ of prohibition, Puckett v. State, 591 So.2d 326 (Fla. 5th DCA 1992), and deny the petition. See Hammond v. Eastmoore, 513 So.2d 770 (Fla. 5th DCA 1987) (motion legally insufficient where no affidavit was included and party did not swear that the facts alleged were true; acknowledgment before notary public insufficient).

PETITION FOR WRIT OF PROHIBITION DENIED.

GOSHORN, THOMPSON and ANTOON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hammond v. Eastmoore
513 So. 2d 770 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1987)
Puckett v. State
591 So. 2d 326 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1992)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
702 So. 2d 306, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 14110, 1997 WL 777697, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rainey-v-rainey-fladistctapp-1997.