Rainey v. Rainey

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Rainey v. Rainey

702 So. 2d 306, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 14110, 1997 WL 777697

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 19, 1997·No. No. 97-419·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Stanley Rainey, pro se, appeals from the order of the circuit judge refusing to disqualify him from presiding over Rainey’s divorce proceeding. We treat the notice of appeal as a petition for writ of prohibition, Puckett v. State, 591 So.2d 326 (Fla. 5th DCA 1992), and deny the petition. See Hammond v. Eastmoore, 513 So.2d 770 (Fla. 5th DCA 1987) (motion legally insufficient where no affidavit was included and party did not swear that the facts alleged were true; acknowledgment before notary public insufficient).

PETITION FOR WRIT OF PROHIBITION DENIED.

GOSHORN, THOMPSON and ANTOON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Stanley Rainey, pro se, appeals from the order of the circuit judge refusing to disqualify him from presiding over Rainey’s divorce proceeding. We treat the notice of appeal as a petition for writ of prohibition, Puckett v. State, 591 So.2d 326 (Fla. 5th DCA 1992), and deny the petition. See Hammond v. Eastmoore, 513 So.2d 770 (Fla. 5th DCA 1987) (motion legally insufficient where no affidavit was included and party did not swear that the facts alleged were true; acknowledgment before notary public insufficient).

PETITION FOR WRIT OF PROHIBITION DENIED.

GOSHORN, THOMPSON and ANTOON, JJ., concur.

Rainey v. Rainey, 702 So. 2d 306, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 14110, 1997 WL 777697 (Fla. Ct. App. 1997).

Pincite

702 So. 2d 306 (Rainey v. Rainey) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related