Rainey v. Jones
This text of 31 Ga. 111 (Rainey v. Jones) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
By the Court.
delivering the opinion.
Had the Court concluded -to retain the injunction in this case, we would not have felt constrained to control the discretion of the Circuit Judge; deciding, however, to dissolve it, it is not, in our judgment, such a flagrant abuse of discretion as demands the interference of this Court.
It is not pretended but that Jones is solvent and able to respond to any duty or damages, which may be imposed upon him; and having confessedly denied all the equity in the bill, we see no sufficient reason for restraining him from prosecucuting his legal rights in the appropriate forum.
JUDGMENT.
Whereupon, it is considered and adjudged by the Court, that the judgment of the Court below be affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
31 Ga. 111, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rainey-v-jones-ga-1860.