Rainey v. Frawley Plaza, LLC

112 A.D.3d 453, 975 N.Y.S.2d 877
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 5, 2013·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Anil C. Singh, J.), entered January 11, 2013, which granted defendants’ motions for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Dismissal of the complaint was appropriate in this action where plaintiff was injured when she allegedly slipped and fell on dust while descending stairs in the lobby of the building in which she lived. Defendants Frawley Plaza, LLC, Putnam Holding Corp., and UA Development Corp. were the owners and property managers of the building, and Iveragh Construction Corp. was performing renovations in the building. Defendants submitted evidence that they lacked notice of the allegedly defective condition by showing that the twice-daily cleaning schedule of the lobby was followed on the day of and the day before plaintiffs fall (see Rodriguez v New York City Hous. Auth., 102 AD3d 407 [1st Dept 2013]).

Plaintiffs opposition failed to raise a triable issue of fact as to notice. In the same vein, plaintiffs claim that Iveragh caused and created the dust condition was speculative (see Morales v Foodways, Inc., 186 AD2d 407 [1st Dept 1992]). Concur — Mazzarelli, J.E, Sweeny, DeGrasse, Freedman and Gische, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rainey v. Frawley Plaza, LLC, 112 A.D.3d 453, 975 N.Y.S.2d 877 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2013).

112 A.D.3d 453 (Rainey v. Frawley Plaza, LLC) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Fernandez v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, NA
2019 NY Slip Op 1645 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2019)