Rainey v. Beech Aircraft Corp.

791 F.2d 833
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit·Decided May 27, 1986·No. Nos. 84-3625, 84-3626·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING AND SUGGESTION FOR REHEARING EN BANC

Before GODBOLD, Chief Judge, RO-NEY, TJOFLAT, HILL, FAY, VANCE, KRAVITCH, JOHNSON, HATCHETT, ANDERSON and CLARK, Circuit Judges.

BY THE COURT:

A member of this Court in active serving having requested a poll on the application for rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in this Court in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,

IT IS ORDERED that the above-consolidated causes shall be reheard by this Court en banc without oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed. The Clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of en banc briefs. The previous panel’s opinion is hereby VACATED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rainey v. Beech Aircraft Corp., 791 F.2d 833 (11th Cir. 1986).

791 F.2d 833 (Rainey v. Beech Aircraft Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Broadnax
23 M.J. 389 (United States Court of Military Appeals, 1987)