Raines v. State

151 S.W. 811, 68 Tex. Crim. 605, 1912 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 660
CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
DecidedDecember 4, 1912
DocketNo. 2113.
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 151 S.W. 811 (Raines v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Raines v. State, 151 S.W. 811, 68 Tex. Crim. 605, 1912 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 660 (Tex. 1912).

Opinion

DAVIDSON, Presiding Judge.

— Appellant was convicted of burglary, his punishment being assessed at ten years confinement in the penitentiary.

This record is before us without a statement of facts, bills of exception, or motion for new trial. The record does not show that notice of appeal was given and entered in the court below. There is a recitation at. the close of the sentence, that inasmuch as defendant *606 has given notice of appeal the judgment will be suspended, but under the decisions this is held not to be sufficient entry of notice of appeal. In any event, in the condition the record is presented, there is nothing the court can review, and the judgment would be affirmed if jurisdiction had attached, but because of want of notice of appeal as required by the statute the appeal is dismissed.

Dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Sauzeda v. State
216 S.W. 1098 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1919)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
151 S.W. 811, 68 Tex. Crim. 605, 1912 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 660, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/raines-v-state-texcrimapp-1912.