Raines v. State

86 S.E. 660, 17 Ga. App. 288, 1915 Ga. App. LEXIS 349
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided October 21, 1915·No. 6469·Published

Opinion

Broyles, J.

1. There was evidence to authorize the verdict of involuntary manslaughter in the commission of an unlawful act, and it was not error for the judge to instruct the jury on the law relating to that grade of homicide. Indeed, his failure to do so would have been reversible error. Taylor v. State, 108 Ga. 389 (34 S. E. 2); Farmer v. State, 112 Ga. 80 (37 S. E. 120); Chapman v. State, 120 Ga. 855 (48 S. E. 350); Jordan v. State, 124 Ga. 780 (53 S. E. 331); Dorsey v. State, 126 Ga. 633 (55 S. E. 479); Joiner v. State, 129 Ga. 295 (58 S. E. 859).

2. In view of the verdict returned, there is no merit in the second ground of the amendment to the .motion for a new trial, which complains that the evidence fails to show that the instrument used was a weapon likely to produce death. Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Raines v. State, 86 S.E. 660, 17 Ga. App. 288, 1915 Ga. App. LEXIS 349 (Ga. Ct. App. 1915).

86 S.E. 660 (Raines v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Taylor v. State
34 S.E. 2 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1899)
Farmer v. State
37 S.E. 120 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1900)
Chapman v. State
48 S.E. 350 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1904)
Jordan v. State
53 S.E. 331 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1906)
Dorsey v. State
55 S.E. 479 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1906)
Joiner v. State
58 S.E. 859 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1907)