Raines v. State
198 So. 2d 835, 1967 Fla. App. LEXIS 4797
Opinion
The appellants were convicted of robbery after a joint trial before the court without jury. Their appeals raise a single point which is that the proof was insufficient to support the judgment. We hold the proof sufficient under the rule stated in Stephens v. State, 92 Fla. 43, 109 So. 303 (1926); Wood v. State, 98 Fla. 703, 124 So. 44 (1929) and the rule stated in State v. Sebastian, Fla.1965, 171 So.2d 893.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Raines v. State, 198 So. 2d 835, 1967 Fla. App. LEXIS 4797 (Fla. Ct. App. 1967).
198 So. 2d 835 (Raines v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. Sebastian
171 So. 2d 893 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1965)
Stephens v. State of Florida
109 So. 303 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1926)
Wood v. State
124 So. 44 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1929)