Raines v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Raines v. State

198 So. 2d 835, 1967 Fla. App. LEXIS 4797

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMay 16, 1967

DocketNos. 66-714, 66-720

StatusPublished

This text of 198 So. 2d 835 (Raines v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Raines v. State, 198 So. 2d 835, 1967 Fla. App. LEXIS 4797 (Fla. Ct. App. 1967).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The appellants were convicted of robbery after a joint trial before the court without jury. Their appeals raise a single point which is that the proof was insufficient to support the judgment. We hold the proof sufficient under the rule stated in Stephens v. State, 92 Fla. 43, 109 So. 303 (1926); Wood v. State, 98 Fla. 703, 124 So. 44 (1929) and the rule stated in State v. Sebastian, Fla.1965, 171 So.2d 893.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The appellants were convicted of robbery after a joint trial before the court without jury. Their appeals raise a single point which is that the proof was insufficient to support the judgment. We hold the proof sufficient under the rule stated in Stephens v. State, 92 Fla. 43, 109 So. 303 (1926); Wood v. State, 98 Fla. 703, 124 So. 44 (1929) and the rule stated in State v. Sebastian, Fla.1965, 171 So.2d 893.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

198 So. 2d 835, 1967 Fla. App. LEXIS 4797, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/raines-v-state-fladistctapp-1967.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack