Raines v. Raines

307 S.W.3d 226, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 416, 2010 WL 1326888
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided April 6, 2010·No. ED 92198·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

John W. Raines appeals from the trial court’s Judgment of Dissolution of Marriage. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal, and we conclude the trial court’s decision is supported by substantial evidence and does not erroneously declare the law, Murphy v. Carron, 536 S.W.2d 30, 32 (Mo. banc 1976), and is not an abuse of discretion, Slattery v. Slattery, 185 S.W.3d 692, 697-98 (Mo.App. E.D.2006). An extended *227 opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b) (2009).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Raines v. Raines, 307 S.W.3d 226, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 416, 2010 WL 1326888 (Mo. Ct. App. 2010).

307 S.W.3d 226 (Raines v. Raines) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Slattery v. Slattery
185 S.W.3d 692 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2006)
Murphy v. Carron
536 S.W.2d 30 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1976)