Rainbow v. Young

154 F. 489, 83 C.C.A. 421, 1907 U.S. App. LEXIS 4559
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit·Decided June 7, 1907·No. No. 2,583·Published

Opinion

VAN DEVANTER, Circuit Judge.

By this writ of error Charles Green Rainbow, James Fisher, and Peter Decora challenge a final order of the Circuit Court denying their application for a discharge upon a writ of habeas corpus. Such an order is not subject to review upon writ of error, but only upon appeal (Rev. St. 763, 764; Act March 3, 1885, 23 St. 437 [U. S. Comp. St. 1901, pp. 594, 595] ; In re Neagle, 135 U. S. 1, 42, 10 Sup. Ct. 658, 34 L. Ed. 55; In re Morrissey, 137 U. S. 157, 11 Sup. Ct. 57, 34 L. Ed. 644; Rice v. Ames, 180 U. S. 371, 21 Sup. Ct. 406, 45 L. Ed. 577; Fisher v. Baker, 203 U. S. 174, 182, 27 Sup. Ct. 135, 51 L. Ed. 142), and therefore we are not at liberty to consider the questions sought to be presented, although ably discussed by counsel.

The writ is accordingly dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rainbow v. Young, 154 F. 489, 83 C.C.A. 421, 1907 U.S. App. LEXIS 4559 (8th Cir. 1907).

154 F. 489 (Rainbow v. Young) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In Re Neagle
135 U.S. 1 (Supreme Court, 1890)
In Re Morrissey
137 U.S. 157 (Supreme Court, 1890)
Rice v. Ames
180 U.S. 371 (Supreme Court, 1901)
Fisher Ex Rel. Barcelon v. Baker
203 U.S. 174 (Supreme Court, 2010)