Rainbow v. Young

Eighth Circuit

Rainbow v. Young

154 F. 489, 83 C.C.A. 421, 1907 U.S. App. LEXIS 4559

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

DecidedJune 7, 1907

DocketNo. 2,583

StatusPublished

This text of 154 F. 489 (Rainbow v. Young) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Rainbow v. Young, 154 F. 489, 83 C.C.A. 421, 1907 U.S. App. LEXIS 4559 (8th Cir. 1907).

Pincite

Opinion

VAN DEVANTER, Circuit Judge.

By this writ of error Charles Green Rainbow, James Fisher, and Peter Decora challenge a final order of the Circuit Court denying their application for a discharge upon a writ of habeas corpus. Such an order is not subject to review upon writ of error, but only upon appeal (Rev. St. 763, 764; Act March 3, 1885, 23 St. 437 [U. S. Comp. St. 1901, pp. 594, 595] ; In re Neagle, 135 U. S. 1, 42, 10 Sup. Ct. 658, 34 L. Ed. 55; In re Morrissey, 137 U. S. 157, 11 Sup. Ct. 57, 34 L. Ed. 644; Rice v. Ames, 180 U. S. 371, 21 Sup. Ct. 406, 45 L. Ed. 577; Fisher v. Baker, 203 U. S. 174, 182, 27 Sup. Ct. 135, 51 L. Ed. 142), and therefore we are not at liberty to consider the questions sought to be presented, although ably discussed by counsel.

The writ is accordingly dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

VAN DEVANTER, Circuit Judge.

By this writ of error Charles Green Rainbow, James Fisher, and Peter Decora challenge a final order of the Circuit Court denying their application for a discharge upon a writ of habeas corpus. Such an order is not subject to review upon writ of error, but only upon appeal (Rev. St. 763, 764; Act March 3, 1885, 23 St. 437 [U. S. Comp. St. 1901, pp. 594, 595] ; In re Neagle, 135 U. S. 1, 42, 10 Sup. Ct. 658, 34 L. Ed. 55; In re Morrissey, 137 U. S. 157, 11 Sup. Ct. 57, 34 L. Ed. 644; Rice v. Ames, 180 U. S. 371, 21 Sup. Ct. 406, 45 L. Ed. 577; Fisher v. Baker, 203 U. S. 174, 182, 27 Sup. Ct. 135, 51 L. Ed. 142), and therefore we are not at liberty to consider the questions sought to be presented, although ably discussed by counsel.

The writ is accordingly dismissed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

154 F. 489, 83 C.C.A. 421, 1907 U.S. App. LEXIS 4559, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rainbow-v-young-ca8-1907.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack