Rainbow v. Winter Conenara Corp.
This text of 252 A.D. 892 (Rainbow v. Winter Conenara Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In a stockholder’s derivative action, brought to compel the individual defendant to account for rents collected by her on behalf of the corporate defendant, order denying motion of the individual defendant to open her default, to vacate the judgment entered thereon, and to restore the ease to the Special Term calendar for a day certain, affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion. Hagarty, Carswell, Davis, Johnston and Adel, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
252 A.D. 892, 300 N.Y.S. 1352, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6702, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rainbow-v-winter-conenara-corp-nyappdiv-1937.