Rainbow Community Hospital, Inc. v. Department of Health & Rehabilitative Services

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Rainbow Community Hospital, Inc. v. Department of Health & Rehabilitative Services

453 So. 2d 1200, 9 Fla. L. Weekly 1687, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 14455

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided August 2, 1984·No. No. AX-19·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the Department’s (Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services) denial of the appellant’s application for certificate of need to construct and operate an osteopathic hospital. The Department adopted the hearing officer’s recommended order. Although it is apparent from the hearing officer’s recommended order that the hearing officer failed to construe the requirements of Section 381.494(2), Florida Statutes, in accordance with this Court’s opinion in Gulf Coast Hospital, Inc. v. Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services, 424 So.2d 86 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982), such was harmless because examination of the record shows that the applicant/appellant failed to present competent substantial evidence demonstrating need for an osteopathic facility. Therefore, the hearing officer did not err in finding that no need for osteopathic beds was shown. It is the applicant’s burden to prove such need by competent substantial evidence.

THOMPSON, NIMMONS and BAR-FIELD, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the Department’s (Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services) denial of the appellant’s application for certificate of need to construct and operate an osteopathic hospital. The Department adopted the hearing officer’s recommended order. Although it is apparent from the hearing officer’s recommended order that the hearing officer failed to construe the requirements of Section 381.494(2), Florida Statutes, in accordance with this Court’s opinion in Gulf Coast Hospital, Inc. v. Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services, 424 So.2d 86 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982), such was harmless because examination of the record shows that the applicant/appellant failed to present competent substantial evidence demonstrating need for an osteopathic facility. Therefore, the hearing officer did not err in finding that no need for osteopathic beds was shown. It is the applicant’s burden to prove such need by competent substantial evidence.

THOMPSON, NIMMONS and BAR-FIELD, JJ., concur.

Rainbow Community Hospital, Inc. v. Department of Health & Rehabilitative Services, 453 So. 2d 1200, 9 Fla. L. Weekly 1687, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 14455 (Fla. Ct. App. 1984).

Pincite

453 So. 2d 1200 (Rainbow Community Hospital, Inc. v. Department of Health & Rehabilitative Services) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related